Rand Paul is Not Casting Aspersions on Murderer President Who is Gay and Believes in Slavery

Rand Paul, who said the President was acting like a King during his filibuster today:

I’m not casting any aspersions on the President. I’m not saying he is a bad person at all...

Later in the hour:

The President’s response to the killing of al-Awlaki’s son, he [the President’s spokesman] said he should have chosen more responsible father.

No, Gibbs didn't say that. He said:

I would suggest that you should have a far more responsible father if they are truly concerned about the well being of their children. I don't think becoming an al Qaeda jihadist terrorist is the best way to go about doing your business.

See, Rand, that's a bit different, isn't it? It's about the father being more responsible, not who the kid "chose" as his father.

Rand Paul last May:

“Call me cynical, but I wasn’t sure his views on marriage could get any gayer,” Paul said. “It did kind of bother me though that he used the justification for in a Biblical reference. He said, ‘A Biblical goal caused him to be for gay marriage.’ And I’m like, what version of the Bible is he reading?”

Rand Paul in May of 2011:

With regard to the idea of whether you have a right to health care, you have realize what that implies. It’s not an abstraction. I’m a physician. That means you have a right to come to my house and conscript me. It means you believe in slavery. 

The President wants to cover more people with health insurance instead of, cough, enslaving ER Doctors who cannot say no to a patient (see the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act, signed by Ronald Reagain in 1986), and Rand Paul calls that slavery. But he's not casting any aspersions on the President. He's not saying he's a bad person. Just a murdering tyrant who says kids should pick better parents if they don't want to be murdered by a President who just might be gay and isn't reading from the same Bible as he is.

OK, then. Please proceed, wingnut.